I know that if you go back to the AD&D2E Ravenloft books, the story from the Handout is how things actually went down, and the character who is the subject of the first story is a new character that was invented for the 5E Module. That this is where van Richten got is "monsters kill everyone you love" curse.
I released the zombies, and the entire tribe was eaten alive. They replied that he had been sold to the vampire, Baron Metus. When I found the caravan, I threatened to set the zombies on the Vistani unless they returned my dear boy. In which we find this entirely contradicting statement. However, in Appendix F (Handouts) we have the. Ezmerelda witnessed van Richten’s act of mercy and was deeply moved by it. Satisfied with their answers, he spared their lives before departing with the information they had given him. Though van Richten could have done them harm, he instead interrogated Ezmerelda’s mother and father on the whereabouts of his missing son. Van Richten tracked down Ezmerelda’s family soon after the kidnapping, but not before the Vistani had sold the boy. Even today, years later, she can still hear Erasmus’s pleas for mercy. When Ezmerelda was a little girl, her family kidnapped van Richten’s teenage son, Erasmus, and delivered him into the clutches of a vampire. In the former's backstory, we have this little snippet regarding their first encounter with the latter. I'm wondering if anything has been said by the developers regarding this.Įzmerelda d'Avenir and "Rictavio" (Rudolph van Richten)
While running Curse of Strahd and prepping ahead, I have happened upon a rather glaring contradiction in the backstories of two of the important NPCs. This question includes NPC lore spoilers for Curse of Strahd, proceed at your own risk.
0 kommentar(er)
